Unmasking the Pollution Haven Effect

By Arik Levinson, M. Taylor. 2004

1,163 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcd3b165f51df49b85e40ae118ebf0ad340a93b4

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

Environmental Regulation and Competitiveness: Empirical Evidence on the Porter Hypothesis from European Manufacturing Sectors (2015, background): “…literature on the pollution heaven hypothesis that investigates the impact of environmental regulation on the relocation of manufacturing enterprises few papers account for endogeneity of enviromental policy variables (Xing and Kolstad, 2002; Ederington and Minier, 2003; Levinson and Taylor, 2008).”
Environmental Policy Stringency, Technical Progress and Pollution Haven Hypothesis (2020, background): “These are aggregation bias, panel heterogeneity and unobserved foreign regulation [16,70,71].”
CO2 emissions embodied in China's exports from 2002 to 2008: A structural decomposition analysis (2011, background): “A 016/j.enpol.2011.08.068 esponding author.”
Environmental regulation and the export dynamics of energy technologies (2008, neutral): “Kodama, 2000, Levinson and Taylor, 2004, among the others). On the contrary, the theory of dynamic competitiveness deriving from technological innovation linked to stringent environmental standards has been exposed fashionably by Porter and van der Linde (1995). Even in the case of this second hypot”
FDI and environmental regulations in China (2008, background): “Third, Keller and Levinson (2002) and Levinson and Taylor (2008) both demonstrate that cross-section analyses cannot control for unobserved heterogeneity among countries.”
Does the EU ETS cause carbon leakage in European manufacturing? (2019, background): “Other research addresses the investment channel: using firm-level data on foreign direct investment (FDI) by German multinational companies, Koch and Basse Mama (2016) find no evidence that the EU ETS has contributed to relocation through an increase in outbound FDI.”
Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: Evidence from South Korea (2014, neutral): “Secondly, even though the pollution haven hypothesis is testable by examining the pattern of FDI flow (Cole and Elliott, 2005; Eskeland and Harrison, 2003; Hanna, 2010; Javorcik and Wei, 2004; Kellenberg, 2009), trade flow (Broner et al., 2012; Ederington et al., 2005; Grossman and Krueger, 1994; Le”
Agglomeration Effects in Foreign Direct Investment and the Pollution Haven Hypothesis (2009, background): “In a recent paper, Levinson and Taylor (2008) point out that if the most pollution-intensive plants within an industry have already relocated at the time expenditure data are collected, pollution abatement expenditures in the remaining plants are likely to be less than the industry average.”