Environmental regulation and foreign direct investment: Evidence from South Korea

302 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Does Environmental Regulation Indirectly Induce Upstream Innovation? New Evidence from India (2017, unknown): “Our findings have important policy implications in the context of an influential debate on how global environmental standards and norms can impact firm-level innovation, trade and productivity (Palmer et al., 1995; Chung, 2014) in developing and less developed economies.”
Pollution Haven and Corruption Paradise (2017, unknown): “Like Damania et al. (2003) which is the seminal article introducing political game to analyse pollution havens, we (cid:28)nd conditions that verify the assumption done here in Equation (14) i.e. ∂E S /∂c comp < 0 .”
The relationship between Co2 emissions, energy consumption, economic growth and FDI: the case of Turkey (2016, methodology): “Clarke and Mirza (2006) state that because of the size distortions of unit roots and co-integration tests, inappropriate models can be applied to determine causal relationships of the variables. In order to avoid these problems, Toda and Yamamoto (1995) proposed a Wald test statistic that follows a ”
Foreign Direct Investment and the Environment (2017, background): “Chung (43) South Korea 2000–2007 DD Yes for polluting industries”