Different Kinds of DIF: A Distinction Between Absolute and Relative Forms of Measurement Invariance and Bias

By Denny Borsboom, G. Mellenbergh, J. van Heerden. 2002

50 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computer Networks and Communications, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcc4b6a8aac4087a4550ceff3ab6077fa5e047bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computer Networks and Communications

1. Denny Borsboom
2. Stéphane Côté
3. J. Edwards
4. Agnes Moors
5. J. de Houwer

In Management Science and Operations Research

1. Denny Borsboom
2. Stéphane Côté
3. J. Edwards
4. Agnes Moors
5. J. de Houwer

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Denny Borsboom

Citations in the corpus

• The concept of validity. (2004, background): “This is not implausible because reliability is an index of measurement precision (Mellenbergh, 1996), and it does seem strange to say that “Test X measures intelligence with a certain precision” but that “The test does not measure intelligence.” Similarly, the concept of validity as defined here doe”