Belief in Free Will: Measurement and Conceptualization Innovations

By R. Rakos, Kimberly R. Laurene, Sarah Skala, S. Slane. 2008

119 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dcbcc030f3eaa8f8fd7f5dba8059b5332015d6cc

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

1. Gilad Feldman
2. Lauren Brewer
3. Roy F. Baumeister
4. Kipling D. Williams
5. W. Keith Campbell
6. Soraya Mehdizadeh

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. Gilad Feldman
2. Roy F. Baumeister

In Sociology and Political Science

1. Lauren Brewer
2. Gilad Feldman
3. Roy F. Baumeister
4. Kathleen D. Vohs
5. Martin S. Hagger
6. Nikos L. D. Chatzisarantis
7. Chris Stiff
8. Chantelle Wood

Citations in the corpus

• Believing versus Disbelieving in Free Will: Correlates and Consequences (2012, background): “But Rakos et al. (2008) found that internal locus of control correlated negatively with both the personal will and general will subscales of the FWDS. Conceptually, self-control is a close relative to free will, and indeed Baumeister’s (2008) research program on free will grew out of his initial…”
• Making sense of agency: Belief in free will as a unique and important construct (2017, methodology): “The belief in free will and locus of control are different constructs (Paulhus & Carey, 2011; Rakos et al., 2008; Stillman et al., 2010; Stroessner & Green, 1990; Waldman, Viney, Bell, Bennett, & Hess, 1983).”