Right node raising and gapping
By Katharina Hartmann. 2000
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc8ab1718253bb18b3e930b2c9e6510d6d6dd14b
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Artificial Intelligence
In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
In Language and Linguistics
Citations in the corpus
- Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis (2014, background): “Note, however, that if right node raising involves ellipsis, as many authors argue (see, e.g., Wexler and Culicover 1980, Kayne 1994, Wilder 1997, Hartmann 2000, Bo'ković 2004b, An 2007), it must be the case that English allows argument ellipsis in the contexts where right node raising affects an…”
- Fragments and ellipsis (2005, background): “…ellipses and which includes sluicing (the question of the proper analysis of traditionally conceived ‘non-constituent deletions’ such as gapping and right-node raising is too complex to address here; see Johnson 1996, Postal 1998, and Hartmann 2000 for recent discussion from various standpoints).”
- On Multidominance and Linearization (2009, background): “For instance, RNR is apparently insensitive to island conditions (see Neijt 1979 and Hartmann 2000, among others; see also below), and it is immune to the Head condition on remnants (Fiengo 1974, Wilder 1997).”
- The Syntax of Appositive Relativization: On Specifying Coordination, False Free Relatives, and Promotion (2006, background): “See Link 1984, Moltmann 1992, and Hartmann 2000 for some discussion.”