Now I’m a Phase, Now I’m Not a Phase: On the Variability of Phases with Extraction and Ellipsis

By Ž. Bošković. Linguistic Inquiry, 2014

316 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/46bc5b3f3b94ad025811cd2b624510bbb8434d86

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

1. William Harwood
2. Gillian Ramchand
3. Peter Svenonius

In Language and Linguistics

1. William Harwood
2. Gillian Ramchand
3. Peter Svenonius
4. Benjamin Bruening

Citations in the corpus

• Deriving the Functional Hierarchy (2014, background): “…modern syntactic representations of the phrase structure of the English verbal extended projection simply assume a templatic ordering of Perf over Prog over Pass (Bjorkman 2011, Sailor 2012, Aelbrecht and Harwood 2013, Bošković 2014), when these elements need to be explicitly represented.”
• Being progressive is just a phase: celebrating the uniqueness of progressive aspect under a phase-based analysis (2015, methodology): “…is far more acceptable when be or been are stranded by ellipsis: 40The difference between Bošković (2014) approach and the one I advocate here is that Bošković (2014) assumes optional auxiliary ellipsis to only be due to a choice between eliding the phasal complement or the entire phase,…”