The Continual Intercomparison of Radiation Codes: Results from Phase I
By L. Oreopoulos, Eli J. Mlawer, Jennifer S. Delamere, T. Shippert, J. Cole, B. Fomin, Michael J. Iacono, Zhonghai Jin, Jiangnan Li, J. Manners and 5 more. 2012
132 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc8423cf3a8b8470f8d94f10ff62d9752c8ca774
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Atmospheric Science
In Global and Planetary Change
Citations in the corpus
- The GFDL Global Atmosphere and Land Model AM4.0/LM4.0: 2. Model Description, Sensitivity Studies, and Tuning Strategies (2018, background): “For example in the CIRC1 (Oreopoulos et al., 2012), benchmark atmosphere (which represents a typical midlatitude summer case) the instantaneous forcing at the tropopause due to a quadrupling of CO2 was previously 9% too small; now it is within 1% of the line-by-line calculation.”
- Contrasting the direct radiative effect and direct radiative forcing of aerosols (2014, unknown): “…been shown to be highly accurate in tests against reference radiative transfer calculations as part of the Continual Intercomparison of Radiation Codes (CIRC) project (Oreopoulos and Mlawer, 2010;Oreopoulos et al., 2012), which included numerous evaluations of the radiative effects due to aerosols.”