Psychology's Status as a Scientific Discipline: Its Empirical Placement within an Implicit Hierarchy of the Sciences

89 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (2010, background): “These studies used a variety of proxy measures including: ratio of theories to laws in introductory textbooks, number of colleagues acknowledged in papers, publication cost of interrupting academic career for one year, proportion of under 35 s who received above-average citations, concentration of c”
Taking the U.S. Patent Office Criteria Seriously: A Quantitative Three-Criterion Creativity Definition and Its Implications (2012, background): “That is, the idea usually represents a combination of ideas that already belong properly to the domain (Simonton, 2004a, 2010a).”
Furious activity vs. understanding: How much expertise is needed to evaluate creative work? (2013, background): “Although most domains take ten years of deliberate practice to become a creative expert (Simonton, 1997), Simonton (2004, 2009) argues for a hierarchy within domains based on seven dimensions ranging from citation concentration to theories-to-laws ratio.”