Vibrotactile in-vehicle navigation system

By J. V. Erp, H. V. Veen. 2004

354 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

A Comparison of Tactile, Visual, and Auditory Warnings for Rear-End Collision Prevention in Simulated Driving (2008, background): “The proposed introduction of in-vehicle transportation information systems and entertainment technology will likely increase demands on driver visual attention (J. D. Lee, 1997; Tijerina, Johnston, Parmer, Winterbottom, & Goodman, 2000; van Erp & van Veen, 2004).”
Multisensory warning signals for event perception and safe driving (2008, background): “Although their participants responded more rapidly to bimodal navigational messages than to unimodal tactile messages (Van Erp and Van Veen 2004 ), and vice versa in the other study (Van Erp and Van Veen 2001), statistical analyses of their data failed to reach significance (see also Nagel et al.”
Using spatial vibrotactile cues to direct visual attention in driving scenes (2005, background): “…be interesting in future research to examine whether vibrotactile cues can also facilitate performance in a more realistic driving situation (cf. Van Erp & van Veen, 2001, 2004), such as in a driving simulator (see Kemeny & Panerai, 2003; Reed & Green, 1999), where drivers may experience a…”