Free Trade and Global Warming: A Trade Theory View of the Kyoto Protocol

By Brian R. Copeland, M. Taylor. 2005

416 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc2e0243faf63d241b50f2828f51d001530c0657

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Economic Growth, Energy Consumption, Financial Development, International Trade and CO2 Emissions, in Indonesia (2013, background): “This depletion of natural resources raises CO2 emissions and causes a decrease in environmental quality (e.g. Schmalensee et al. [83], Copeland and Taylor [18], Chaudhuri and Pfaff [13]).”
How to make the clean development mechanism sustainable--The potential of rent extraction (2007, background): “However, this is only true under specific assumptions, and permit trade can well be harming due to other free trade effects (Copeland and Taylor 2000) or weak property rights (Chichilnisky 1994), for example.”
Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations (2012, neutral): “…membership is measured by simple dummy variables.5 There is a rich theoretical and quantitative literature on the effectiveness of climate policies in the presence of international trade; see Copeland and Taylor (2005) for an important early contribution and de Melo and Mathys (2010) for a survey.”
Games of Climate Change with International Trade (2004, background): “Copeland and Taylor (2000) look at the demand for unilateral emission reduction in a CGE model with international trade in goods as well as emission permits.”
Carbon leakage revisited: unilateral climate policy with directed technical change (2008, neutral): “Copeland and Taylor (2005) show, among other things, that in the presence of international trade and environmental preferences, a country’s response to a rest-of-world emissions reduction is ambiguous.”
Trade openness–carbon emissions nexus: The importance of turning points of trade openness for country panels (2016, background): “Recently, this question has been the focus of global efforts to design a world trade policy (Taylor, 2004; Copeland and Taylor, 2005; Ahmed and Long, 2013).”