Kyoto and the carbon footprint of nations

By Rahel Aichele, Gabriel Felbermayr. 2012

339 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/60b82edd66413e9f22ae5b90a0042fa0cf18910a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

1. Manfred Lenzen
2. Richard Wood
3. Daniel Moran
4. Edgar G. Hertwich
5. Keiichiro Kanemoto
6. Arne Geschke
7. Anne Owen
8. D. Ivanova

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

1. Manfred Lenzen
2. Richard Wood
3. Edgar G. Hertwich
4. Anne Owen
5. Daniel Moran
6. Keiichiro Kanemoto
7. Arne Geschke
8. Helene Naegele

Citations in the corpus

• Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Economic Growth: An Assessment Based on Production and Consumption Emission Inventories (2017, background): “3 Although Aichele and Felbermayr (2012) estimate the impact of the ratification of the Kyoto Protocol on CO2 production and consumption inventories, they do not empirically test the Kuznets curve hypothesis.”
• Carbon Leakage and Competitiveness of Cement and Steel Industries Under the EU ETS: Much Ado About Nothing (2016, methodology): “Aichele and Felbermayr (2012) assessed the impact of the Kyoto protocol on CO 2 emissions, CO 2 footprint and CO 2 net imports, using a differences-in-differences approach with the International Criminal Court participation as an instrumental variable for Kyoto ratification.”
• Kyoto and Carbon Leakage: An Empirical Analysis of the Carbon Content of Bilateral Trade (2015, methodology): “…illustrative evidence that Kyoto countries—those with binding Kyoto commitments—adopted more climate policy measures after ratification.3 Moreover, Aichele and Felbermayr (2012) use an instrumental variables (IV) approach4 to show that Kyoto commitment has indeed reduced territorial carbon…”
• International trade undermines national emission reduction targets: New evidence from air pollution (2014, background): “However estimates now indicate that it is not minor, and that up to 30% of global emissions are linked to production for export (Aichele and Felbermayr, 2012; Andrew et al., 2013; Caldeira and Davis, 2011; Chen and Chen, 2011; Hertwich and Peters, 2009; Nakano et al., 2009; Peters and Hertwich,…”
• Climate agreement and technology diffusion: Impact of the Kyoto Protocol on international patent applications for renewable energy technologies (2019, background): “Several studies find that countries with binding emission targets under the Protocol have lower GHG emissions than they would have had in the absence of these targets (Aichele and Felbermayr, 2012; Almer and Winkler, 2017; and Grunewald and Martinez-Zarzoso, 2016).”
• EFFECTS OF SECTOR AGGREGATION ON CO2 MULTIPLIERS IN MULTIREGIONAL INPUT–OUTPUT ANALYSES (2014, background): “…a more equitable principle for designing international climate and emissions agreements, which would also help to avoid the leakage effects experienced in the Kyoto Protocol (Peters and Hertwich, 2008; Chen and Chen, 2011; Peters et al., 2011b; Aichele and Felbermayr, 2012; Kanemoto et al., 2014).”
• Trade and the Environment: New Methods, Measurements, and Results (2017, neutral): “These composition effects were, however, very small, while the measured 10The effects of the Kyoto Protocol on trade are also examined in Aichele & Felbermayr (2012, 2013). technique effects were large.”
• Does the EU ETS cause carbon leakage in European manufacturing? (2019, methodology): “In an application, Aichele and Felbermayr (2015) use a Dixit-Krugman-style”
• Analyzing the impacts of carbon regulatory mechanisms on supplier and mode selection decisions: An application to a biofuel supply chain (2014, background): “These works focus on the factors and policies that impact emissions in different countries that are part of the chain (Aichele and Felbermayr, 2012; Fan et al., 2012; Rizet et al., 2012).”
• Mapping the carbon footprint of EU regions (2017, background): “Studies have signalled for the empirical significance of carbon off-shoring (Harris et al 2012, Aichele and Felbermayr 2012), e.g. showing that countries committed to the Kyoto Protocol have about 8% more carbon-intensive imports than uncommitted ones (Aichele and Felbermayr 2015).”