Emotions : an essay in aid of moral psychology

By Robert C. Roberts. 2003

535 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: History, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dc0c55a4f2cff8e6f9dde97bb060cd47e554dca0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In History

1. M. Brady
2. Sabine A. Döring

In Social Psychology

1. M. Brady
2. Sabine A. Döring
3. J. Slaby

In Sociology and Political Science

1. M. Brady
2. Sabine A. Döring

Citations in the corpus

• The irrationality of recalcitrant emotions (2009, background): “The ‘neojudgementalist’ camp includes de Sousa (1991), Roberts (2003), Greenspan (1988), Stocker and Hegeman (1996), and Calhoun (1984), amongst others.”
• Deservingness and emotions: Applying the structural model of deservingness to the analysis of affective reactions to outcomes (2006, unknown): “…(e.g., Ben Ze’ev, 2000; Brigham, Kelso, Jackson, & Smith, 1997; Darley & Pittman, 2003; Foster, 1972; Heider, 1958; Kristjansson, 2006; Ortony, Clore, & Collins, 1988; Parrott, 1991, 2001; Portmann, 2000; Rawls, 1971; Roberts, 2003; Schoeck, 1969; Smith, 1991; Solomon, 1990; Weiner, 1995, 2006).”
• Seeing What to Do: Affective Perception and Rational Motivation (2007, background): “Most philosophers accept that a theory of emotion, although it must not reduce emotion to feeling, has to account for the fact that emotions are by their nature felt states (cf., e.g. Goldie 2000; Nussbaum 2001; Helm 2001; Döring and Peacocke 2002; Roberts 2003).”