Bioenergy revisited: Key factors in global potentials of bioenergy
By V. Dornburg, D. V. van Vuuren, Gerrie W. J. van de Ven, H. Langeveld, M. Meeusen, M. Banse, Mark van Oorschot, J. Ros, Gert Jan van den Born, H. Aiking and 5 more. 2010
285 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Biomedical Engineering, Pollution, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbf313760233377baae53024aff791f16f0920dd
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Biomedical Engineering
In Pollution
In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
Citations in the corpus
- Miscanthus: A Promising Biomass Crop (2010, unknown): “The feasibility and impact of large-scale biomass production have been intensely debated and investigated in recent years (Dohleman et al., 2010; Dornburg et al., 2010; Fargione et al., 2008; Hertel et al., 2010; Hill et al., 2009; Kim et al., 2009; Levasseur et al., 2010; Reijnders, 2010; Smeets…”
- The role of negative CO2 emissions for reaching 2 °C—insights from integrated assessment modelling (2013, background): “The literature review by Dornburg et al. (2010) shows a comparable range.”
- Is energy cropping in Europe compatible with biodiversity? – Opportunities and threats to biodiversity from land-based production of biomass for bioenergy purposes (2013, background): “[25] Dornburg V, van Vuuren D, van de Ven G, Langeveld H, Meeusen M, Banse M, et al.”
- Bioenergy from “surplus” land: environmental and socio-economic implications (2012, background): “On degraded land, two major constraints of biomass production are the large efforts and long time period required for the reclamation of degraded land and the low productivity levels of these soils (Dornburg et al. 2010).”
- International bioenergy trade—A review of past developments in the liquid biofuel market (2011, background): “[2] Dornburg V, van Vuuren D, van de Ven G, Langeveld H, Meeusen M, Banse M, et al.”
- Pathways to Shape the Bioeconomy (2017, background): “The key factors also include agricultural commodity prices and the cost of biomass production, political instabilities in producer countries, the availability of biogenic residues and wastes, and competing uses [54,59,61].”
- Abandoning the concept of renewable energy (2019, background): “As for societal impacts, on a global scale biomass-based energy production competes with food production for agricultural land and water (Gerbens-Leenes et al., 2009; Dornburg et al., 2010), which could lead to increased food prices, causing major problems for the poorest people and potentially resu”
- Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates (2017, background): “However, due to the variety of applicable models [113], the number of driving forces and their open future change [114,115], the multifunctionality of land [116] and complex feedback mechanisms [117], forecast uncertainties in the context of future biomass potentials and potential land use conflicts”
- Integrated assessment of biomass supply and demand in climate change mitigation scenarios (2019, background): “This means that when setting up policies to mitigate climate change through the use of biomass, bioenergy, and biochemicals, it is important to understand the interactions and tradeoffs within and between the energy and land systems (Dornburg et al., 2010; Hoogwijk et al., 2005; Slade et al., 2014; ”
- The effect of bioenergy expansion: Food, energy, and environment (2014, background): “[11] analyzed a number of projections and pointed out that studies on the potential of biomass as an energy source are in the range of 0–1500 EJ.”