Core: a collaborative reputation mechanism to enforce node cooperation in mobile ad hoc networks

By Pietro Michiardi, Refik Molva. Communications and Multimedia Security, 2002

1,890 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/dbe9663d5b79072b0be13d0f25200b399f9897dd

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

A Survey on Intrusion Detection in Mobile Ad Hoc Networks (2007, methodology): “Michiardi and Molva [7] presented a technique to detect a specific type of misbehaving nodes, which are selfish nodes, and also force them to cooper-”
Game Theory in Wireless and Communication Networks (2008, methodology): “They show that the formation of large coalitions of cooperating nodes is possible when a mechanism similar to CORE [336] is used.”
Trust-based security for wireless ad hoc and sensor networks (2007, background): “Some research work has shown that rating nodes’ trust and reputation is an effective approach in distributed environments to improve security [2,13,27,33], to support decision-making [3,23,43], and to promote node collaboration [10,19,29,32].”
A charging and rewarding scheme for packet forwarding in multi-hop cellular networks (2003, background): “Both the CON-FIDANT [5] and the CORE [27] approaches propose a reputation based solution to identify and punish misbehaving nodes.”
Denial of service resilience in ad hoc networks (2004, background): “Michiardi and Molva proposed another reputation-based system, named CORE [28].”
Nash equilibria of packet forwarding strategies in wireless ad hoc networks (2006, background): “Index Terms—Ad hoc networks, cooperation, graph theory, game theory, Nash equilibrium.”
Ad hoc-VCG: a truthful and cost-efficient routing protocol for mobile ad hoc networks with selfish agents (2003, methodology): “[21, 5, 23, 24 ] propose different repudiation systems with respect to how this information is propagated within the network.”
A survey of security issues in mobile ad hoc and sensor networks (2005, background): “Two solutions belonging to the reputation-based category have been proposed, namely CORE [37] and CONFIDANT [39, 40].”
A Survey of Intrusion Detection Systems in Wireless Sensor Networks (2014, methodology): “Both the proposed schemes ([16] and [39]) are applicable to WSNs with a slight modification: The renewal period of the reputation tables would be decreased, in order to increase the bandwidth efficiency.”
Self-policing mobile ad hoc networks by reputation systems (2005, background): “Michiardi and Molva [10] proposed a COllaborative REputation mechanism that also has a watchdog component for monitoring; it is complemented by a reputation mechanism that differentiates between subjective reputation (observations), indirect reputation (positive reports by others), and functional re”
Reputation-based framework for high integrity sensor networks (2004, background): “Much closer to our context are reputation systems designed for ad-hoc networks, Confidant [Buchegger and Boudec 2002] and Core [Michiardi and Molva 2002], and peer-to-peer networks [Xiong and Liu 2003].”
A Survey of Trust and Reputation Management Systems in Wireless Communications (2010, background): “A watchdog can be an ordinary node (assuming enough computational and storage capacity) [11], [25], a specialized node [29], or even a module residing in each node [14].”
Twenty Security Considerations for Cloud-Supported Internet of Things (2016, unknown): “worthy nodes in a network [65], analyzing the data outputs, patterns of behavior or reputation of a “thing” [66], or perhaps involve human intervention, e.”