Denial of service resilience in ad hoc networks

By Imad Aad, Jean-Pierre Hubaux, Edward W. Knightly. ACM/IEEE International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking, 2004

371 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Security in mobile ad hoc networks: challenges and solutions (2004, methodology): “Rushing Attack: Rushing attack is that results in denial-ofservice when used against all previous on-demand ad hoc network routing protocols [16].”
Security and Cooperation in Wireless Networks (2007, background): “Using for example T = 1s, inspired by [244, 7], the same jamming D/T = X proportion leads to a better throughput for Mc and lower consumption for M , thus making the attack even more devastating.”
GSIS: A Secure and Privacy-Preserving Protocol for Vehicular Communications (2007, background): “Since DoS attack in wireless communication networks has extensively been investigated in the past [6], [22]–[25], in this paper, we will focus on the security and privacy issues which are not related to the DoS attack.”
Securing wireless sensor networks: a survey (2008, background): “Aad, Hubaux, and Knightly [128] studied a particular DoS attack, namely, JellyFish, in which relay nodes stealthily reorder, delay, or periodically drop packets that are expected to be forwarded, in a way that leads end-to-end congestion control protocols astray.”
A survey of attacks and detection mechanisms on intelligent transportation systems: VANETs and IoV (2017, methodology): “Some solutions, such as [17] that proposed detection of DoS attacks against MANETs, could also be employed in VANETs.”