Modeling the carbon cost of plant nitrogen acquisition: Mycorrhizal trade‐offs and multipath resistance uptake improve predictions of retranslocation

157 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Effects of model structural uncertainty on carbon cycle projections: biological nitrogen fixation as a case study (2015, background): “…controls BNF rates (Gerber et al 2010), whereas phosphorus (P) availability is more important in CASA-CNP (Wang et al 2007, Wang et al 2010, figure 1(c)), and N availability and plant N demand is critical in the fixation and uptake of nitrogen model (FUN; Fisher et al 2010, Brzostek et al 2014).”
The Community Land Model Version 5: Description of New Features, Benchmarking, and Impact of Forcing Uncertainty (2019, methodology): “Note that N uptake costs of some PFTs were adjusted from Brzostek et al. (2014) values to reduce biases in GPP, especially broadleaf tropical deciduous trees and C4 grass, which Brzostek et al. (2014) did not provide.”
Diverse Mycorrhizal Associations Enhance Terrestrial C Storage in a Global Model (2019, methodology): “C allocated to N acquisition was partitioned among symbioses based on the relative ROI for each symbiosis, following the C cost optimization structure of Brzostek et al. (2014).”