Why do alien plant species that reproduce in natural habitats occur more frequently?

By I. Kühn, M. Brandenburg, S. Klotz. 2004

103 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db82822b33b57ec7e2e836dd8323431dd970ff8e

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

In Plant Science

Citations in the corpus

Correlates of naturalization and occupancy of introduced ornamentals in Germany. (2008, background): “Range size often is a very influential parameter that, in our study, was only correlated with naturalization (Rejmánek, 1996; Goodwin et al., 1999; but see Kühn et al., 2004).”
The global invasion success of Central European plants is related to distribution characteristics in their native range and species traits (2009, background): “…both in space (by widespread dissemination or abundant plantings) and time (by long history of cultivation), which fundamentally influences the probability of invasions by alien species (Rouget & Richardson, 2003; Kühn et al., 2004a; Lockwood et al., 2005; Richardson, 2006; Catford et al., 2009).”
The alien flora of Kashmir Himalaya (2007, background): “Although a belated beginning has been made in the compilation of alien floras (Rejmanek and Randall 1994; Weber 2003; Kuhn et al. 2004) but no such activity is visible as yet in the developing world where incidently most of the biodiversity exists (Richardson 2004) except for works of Li and Xie…”
Changes in the spatio-temporal patterns and habitat preferences of Ambrosia artemisiifolia during its invasion of Austria. (2009, background): “More widespread alien plant species have a wider niche breadth in Central Europe (Kühn et al. 2004).”
Urbanization and homogenization – Comparing the floras of urban and rural areas in Germany (2006, methodology): “%) of the non-city data is from after 1980 (Kühn et al., 2004b).”
Successful invaders co-opt pollinators of native flora and accumulate insect pollinators with increasing residence time. (2011, unknown): “…4000 native and alien plant species, their distribution, habitats, biological traits, and for aliens, invasion status and history (see Pyšek et al. 2002 for details); additional data on species biological traits were taken from the German database BiolFlor (Klotz et al. 2002, Kühn et al. 2004).”
Alien plants associate with widespread generalist arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal taxa: evidence from a continental‐scale study using massively parallel 454 sequencing (2011, background): “As successful plant invaders are frequently generalists (e.g. Kühn et al., 2004; Küster et al., 2008), we hypothesize that invasive AM plants are likely to be generalist hosts that associate primarily with the widely distributed generalist AM fungal taxa present in any novel range.”
Inventory of the non‐native flora of Italy (2009, background): “Nevertheless, a comparison between our inventory and other lists based on approaches that are most similar to ours reveals comparable percentages of non-native taxa in the flora of other southern European countries, e.g. 12% in Spain (Sanz-Elorza et al. 2004), though higher percentages in the flora ”
Distribution patterns, range size and niche breadth of Austrian endemic plants. (2009, background): “In contrast to alien plants in Central Europe (Kühn et al., 2004), the rather weak relation of range size to the tested niche breadth variables indicates that the numbers of habitats colonized and altitudinal distribution only cover a moderate fraction of the features responsible for an endemic taxo”
The LEDA Traitbase: a database of life‐history traits of the Northwest European flora (2008, background): “Specifically, there has been a long quest for traits that make species invasive (e.g. Kühn et al. 2004; Moles et al. 2008, see Pysek & Richardson 2007 for a review) or influence commonness and rarity in weeds (e.g. Lososová et al. 2008) or urban plant species (Thompson & McCarthy, in press).”
Alien flora of Europe: species diversity, temporal trends, geographical patterns and research needs. (2008, background): “…first step in the search for the explanation of invasion patterns, and for characterizing invasive taxa and invaded ecosystems (e.g., Crawley et al. 1996, Cadotte & Lovett-Doust 2001, Kühn et al. 2003, 2004, Lloret et al. 2004, 2005, Hamilton et al. 2005; see Pyšek & Richardson 2007 for a review).”
Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora (2008, background): “Journal compilation © 2008 British Ecological Society, Journal of Ecology, 96, 860–868 Germany see also Kühn & Klotz 2003; for details on the influence of habitat range on invasion success see also Kühn et al. 2004).”
Plant invasions: merging the concepts of species invasiveness and community invasibility (2006, methodology): “…of invasions by alien species has been convincingly demonstrated (Mulvaney, 2001; Kowarik, 1995; Crooks and Soulé, 1999; Richardson, 1999; Rejmánek, 2000; Kolar and Lodge, 2002; Williams et al., 2002; Rouget and Richardson, 2003; Brown and Peet, 2003, Kühn et al., 2004; Foxcroft et al., 2004).”
Species traits explain recent range shifts of Finnish butterflies (2009, methodology): “Therefore, following Brändle et al. (2003) and Kühn et al. (2004), we performed a hierarchical partitioning (HP) analysis in two ways: firstly, using the original ‘raw’ values of the response and species trait variables, and secondly, by substituting the original values by phylogenetically…”