Trait interactions help explain plant invasion success in the German flora
By E. Küster, I. Kühn, Helge Bruelheide, S. Klotz. 2008
197 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/4b9965b0c8fa5a7d545306b7c57e93dba59333bf
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
In Nature and Landscape Conservation
In Plant Science
Citations in the corpus
- Reproductive characteristics of neophytes in the Czech Republic: traits of invasive and non-invasive species. (2010, background): “However, it needs to be borne in mind that the present paper is based on single trait analyses that, while indicative of the role individual traits may play, only capture a limited proportion of variation in invasive success, i.e. not that included in trait interactions (Küster et al. 2008).”
- Correlates of naturalization and occupancy of introduced ornamentals in Germany. (2008, background): “Recently, the importance of interactions among traits affecting invasiveness has been discussed (Lloret et al., 2005; Herron et al., 2007; Küster et al., 2008).”
- Alien plants associate with widespread generalist arbuscular mycorrhizal fungal taxa: evidence from a continental‐scale study using massively parallel 454 sequencing (2011, background): “As successful plant invaders are frequently generalists (e.g. Kühn et al., 2004; Küster et al., 2008), we hypothesize that invasive AM plants are likely to be generalist hosts that associate primarily with the widely distributed generalist AM fungal taxa present in any novel range.”
- Introduction history and species characteristics partly explain naturalization success of North American woody species in Europe (2009, result): “To the best of our knowledge, hardly any other studies (but see Küster et al .”
- Predicting invasion success of forest pathogenic fungi from species traits (2011, background): “This approach is likely to prove more relevant than sequential traitbased approaches, becausedifferent ecological strategies, determined by particular combinations of traits, may be associated with invasion success (Küster et al. 2008).”
- A test of baker’s law: breeding systems of invasive species of Asteraceae in China (2011, result): “Our study and other recent studies (Rambuda and Johnson 2004; van Kleunen and Johnson 2007; Küster et al. 2008; Lambdon et al. 2008; van Kleunen et al. 2008) provide empirical support for the inclusion of the breeding system as one of the key elements in risk assessment protocols for plant…”
- Invasion of Solidago gigantea in contrasting experimental plant communities: effects on soil microbes, nutrients and plant–soil feedbacks (2010, background): “Clonal expansion is a strategy described for many invasive plants (Thompson, Hodgson & Rich 1995; Küster et al. 2008) and increases in soil organic carbon have often been observed in response to plant invasions (Scott, Saggar & Mc Intosh 2001, Fickbohm& Zhu 2006, Heneghan et al. 2006, Vila et al.…”
- Troubling travellers: are ecologically harmful alien species associated with particular introduction pathways? (2017, background): “Lastly, taxa introduced by multiple pathways and introduced to different regions and habitats have a higher opportunity to become naturalized and then may have a greater probability of causing impact than those arriving on only one pathway (Küster et al. 2008).”
- MAcroecological Framework for Invasive Aliens (MAFIA): disentangling large-scale context dependence in biological invasions (2020, methodology): “…in invasions in concert with other factors codetermining invasiveness (e.g. Herron et al. 2007; van Kleunen and Johnson 2007; Gravuer et al. 2008; Küster et al. 2008), but none of them simultaneously: (i) used a global dataset, (ii) analysed different stages of invasion process, (iii) took…”
- Invasive species in Europe: ecology, status, and policy (2011, background): “[88] found that trait interactions accounted for >40% of the variation that could explain invasion success of non-native terrestrial plants in Germany.”
- Impact of three aquatic invasive species on native plants and macroinvertebrates in temperate ponds (2011, background): “Several researchers suggested that a combination of biological traits can explain invasion success of alien plants (Verlaque et al. 2002; Sutherland 2004; Küster et al. 2008; Milbau and Stout 2008; Pyšek et al. 2009).”
- Factors explaining alien plant invasion success in a tropical ecosystem differ at each stage of invasion (2009, result): “As in other studies (Kuster et al. 2008; Lambdon 2008; Milbau & Stout 2008), phylogeny played a relatively minor role in explaining species success at each stage of invasion compared to explanatory variables (Fig.”
- Successful invaders co-opt pollinators of native flora and accumulate insect pollinators with increasing residence time. (2011, unknown): “Despite strong environmental changes over the past two hundred years in Central Europe, there is some evidence that the composition of pollination modes in native species and archaeophytes did not change over more than three centuries, but it did in neophytes (Knapp et al. 2010).”