Environmental policy incentives to adopt advanced abatement technology:: Will the true ranking please stand up?

By Till Requate, Wolfram Unold. 2003

421 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db6e6585c88ac1f7cfcadaf85d285a978bfe11a6

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

In Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment

Citations in the corpus

Abatement and Allocation in the Pilot Phase of the EU ETS (2009, background): “…theory that market based policy tools encourage the development and adoption of pollution abatement technology or behavior to enable emissions reductions more efficiently than command and control style regulation (Milliman and Prince, 1989; Jung, Krutilla, and Boyd, 1996; Requate and Unold, 2003).”
Technology Choice and Capacity Portfolios under Emissions Regulation (2016, neutral): “Requate (2005) and Requate and Unold (2003) also treat the problem deterministically in a competitive setting where each ﬁrm selects a single technology.”
Technical change and the marginal cost of abatement (2008, background): “[40], Bansal and Gangopadhyay [5], Kennedy and Laplante [27], Newell and Stavins [32], Parry et al.”
Stimulating Different Types of Eco-Innovation in the UK: Government Policies and Firm Motivations (2011, background): “…see Regulatory Push as the main driver of eco-innovation and often suggest that market-based instruments are superior to command and 6 control policies in reducing pollution due to cost-efficiency and flexibility advantages 5 (Milliam and Prince, 1989; Requate and Unold, 2003; Requate, 2005).”
The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments — A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? (2011, background): “Requate and Unold (2003) and Requate (2005) provided a comprehensive review on the theoretical inquiries on the incentives for adoption and development (including R&D) of innovations provided by environmental policy.”
Efficiency, Productivity and Environmental Policy: A Case Study of Power Generation in the EU (2012, background): “The literature emphasises two characteristics of marketable pollution permits that are relevant to our efforts: on the one hand, like all other market-based instruments, they are capable of bringing about pollution reductions at least cost (Montgomery, 1972; Tietenberg, 1990, among others); on the o”
Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature (2018, background): “Still, under free allocation, the opportunity costs of the emission certificates remain, thus also generating incentives for abatement and investment signals – as long as the price is positive (Requate & Unold, 2003).”