Generalized Gini Indices of Equality of Opportunity

By John A. Weymark. 2003

64 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Computational Theory and Mathematics, Economics and Econometrics, General Decision Sciences

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db59d73eacb763fa87b269e31d4922d79500d375

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Computational Theory and Mathematics

1. François Maniquet
2. Marc Fleurbaey
3. John E. Roemer
4. Alain Trannoy
5. V. Peragine

In Economics and Econometrics

1. John E. Roemer
2. V. Peragine
3. Alain Trannoy
4. Marc Fleurbaey
5. François Maniquet
6. Gaston Yalonetzky
7. Gustavo A. Marrero
8. Daniele Checchi

In General Decision Sciences

1. John E. Roemer
2. Marc Fleurbaey
3. V. Peragine
4. François Maniquet
5. Alain Trannoy

Citations in the corpus

• Equality of Opportunity: Theory and Measurement (2016, background): “Therefore, these authors link Van de gaer’s proposal to the large literature on equalizing opportunity sets (e.g., Kranich 1996; Ok 1997; Bossert 1996; Ok and Kranich 1998; Weymark 2003; and Foster 2011), which derived its inspiration from Sen’s capability approach.”
• Compensation and responsibility (2011, background): “See also Arlegi and Nieto (1999) and Weymark (2003), the latter revisiting the results of Kranich (1996) with a version of the Pigou-Dalton transfer principle that only applies when the opportunity sets are nested.”
• Ranking Income Distributions According to Equality of Opportunity (2004, background): “Kranich [13], Ok [16], Ok and Kranich [17], Weymark [ 26 ], and others.”