Beyond Gaussian averages: redirecting international business and management research toward extreme events and power laws

By Pierpaolo Andriani, Bill McKelvey. 2007

158 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Practicing managers live in a world of ‘extremes’, but international business and management research is based on Gaussian statistics that rule out such extremes. On occasion, positive feedback processes among interactive data points cause extreme events characterized by power laws. They seem ubiquitous; we list 80 kinds of them – half each among natural and social phenomena. We use imposed tension and Per Bak's ‘self-organized criticality’ to argue that Pareto-based science and statistics (based on interdependence, positive feedback, scalability, (nearly) infinite variance, and emphasizing extremes) should parallel the traditional dominance of Gaussian statistics (based on independent data points, finite variance and emphasizing averages). We question quantitative journal publications depending on Gaussian statistics. The cost is inaccurate science and irrelevance to practitioners. In conclusion, no statistical findings should be accepted into business studies if they gain significance via some assumption device by which extreme events and (nearly) infinite variance are ignored. Accordingly, we suggest redirecting international business studies, and management research in general.

Subfields: Global and Planetary Change, Management Science and Operations Research, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/db04f6a10821a2e09e16ea87b3c6d6b6d92dc872

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Global and Planetary Change

  1. Svante Andersson

In Management Science and Operations Research

  1. Svante Andersson

In Sociology and Political Science

  1. Svante Andersson

Citations in the corpus