The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom
By Dennis M. Murphy. 2012
1,188 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Political Science and International Relations, Social Sciences & Humanities
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Political Science and International Relations
- Anita R. Gohdes
- Andreu Casas
- Anders Larsson
- Eddie Yang
- Jing Zeng
- Margaret E. Roberts
- N. Williams
- Zeynep Tufekci
In Social Sciences & Humanities
- Anita R. Gohdes
- Andreu Casas
- Anders Larsson
- Eddie Yang
- Jing Zeng
- Margaret E. Roberts
- N. Williams
- Zeynep Tufekci
Citations in the corpus
- Images that Matter: Online Protests and the Mobilizing Role of Pictures (2018, background): “2. cf. the “slacktivism” concept of Morozov (2011).”
- Corrupting the Cyber-Commons: Social Media as a Tool of Autocratic Stability (2015, neutral): “9 Alterman 2011, Gladwell 2010, Morozov 2011a. 10 Shirky 2011.”
- Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign (2012, background): “Evgeny Morozov (2009, 2011) is not as coy in his criticisms of what he claims is the hyperbole surrounding Twitter use during the Iran election.”
- Social Media and the Decision to Participate in Political Protest: Observations From Tahrir Square (2012, background): “Perspectives range across the full spectrum from those who view the Internet as potentially disruptive (Aday et al., 2010; Howard, 2010) to those who argue that it may even support authoritarian regimes (Morozov, 2011).”
- No Encore for Encore? Ethical questions for web-based censorship measurement (2015, background): “Moving from the realm of computers and networks to the realm of people and governments, political scientists are interested in Internet censorship in terms of the motives of censors, the impact of censorship on freedom of speech, and so on [25].”
- Censorship of Online Encyclopedias: Implications for NLP Models (2021, background): “Government censorship of social media, news, and websites directly affects large corpuses of text by blocking users’ access, deleting individualmessages, adding content through propaganda, or inducing self-censorship through intimidation and laws [11, 19, 20, 22, 25, 32, 34].”
- #MeToo as Connective Action: A Study of the Anti-Sexual Violence and Anti-Sexual Harassment Campaign on Chinese Social Media in 2018 (2020, background): “Other critics of the theory (e.g., Bondes and Schucher 2014; Lim 2013; Morozov 2011) suggest that what Bennett and Segerberg (2013) describe as “connective actions” are often short-lived, unsustainable, and have limited influence on offline events.”
- Pulling the plug (2015, background): “Censorship of the internet is nothing new: authoritarian regimes intent on maintaining the status quo within their country have been relatively successful at manipulating content in their favor (Morozov, 2012; Rød & Weidmann, 2013).”