No Encore for Encore? Ethical questions for web-based censorship measurement

By Arvind Narayanan, Ben Zevenbergen. 2015

28 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Psychology

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Artificial Intelligence

1. Carlos Castillo
2. Fernando Diaz
3. Helena Webb
4. Allan Dafoe
5. Jan Leike
6. Emre Kıcıman
7. Alexandra Olteanu
8. Hamed Zamani

In Clinical Psychology

1. Carlos Castillo
2. Emre Kıcıman

Citations in the corpus

• Social Data: Biases, Methodological Pitfalls, and Ethical Boundaries (2019, background): “In an unprecedented move, the Program Committee (PC) of SIGCOMM 2015 decided to accept the Encore research paper on the condition of placing a prominent note at the top of the paper highlight the PC’s ethical concerns (Narayanan and Zevenbergen, 2015).”
• Institutionalizing ethics in AI through broader impact requirements (2021, background): “In practice, rejections on the basis of ethical grounds are rare and opinions about the legitimacy and effectiveness of PC ethical oversight are mixed [29, 30].”