Limits to redistribution in a democracy: a survey

116 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Response to David J. Samuels and Ben W. Ansell’s review of From Open Secrets to Secret Voting: Democratic Electoral Reforms and Voter Autonomy (2014, background): “Reviews of the literature include Harms and Zink (2003); Mueller (2003); Roemer (1998).”
Redistributive Conflicts and Preferences for Tax Schemes in Europe (2010, background): “Following these lines, a great deal of research has been done on the determinants of preferences for redistribution at the individual level during the last decade (Harms and Zink, 2003; Lübker, 2007).”
The Effect of Direct Democracy on Income Redistribution: Evidence for Switzerland (2010, unknown): “See HARMS and ZINK (2003). The reason for it is our conjecture that both do not differentially impact income redistribution in different democratic systems.”
Inequality and Happiness: When Perceived Social Mobility and Economic Reality do not Match (2010, unknown): “, Harms and Zink (2003) for a survey of the political economy of income redistribution.”
VOTING, INEQUALITY AND REDISTRIBUTION (2007, unknown): “See also the survey by Harms and Zink (2003).”