VOTING, INEQUALITY AND REDISTRIBUTION

288 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Comparing Labor Supply Elasticities in Europe and the US: New Results (2012, methodology): “…nature of the model at the individual level, consists of repeatedly drawing a set of J+1 random terms for each household from an EV-I distribution (together with terms for unobserved heterogeneity), which generate a perfect match between predicted and observed choices (see Creedy and Kalb, 2005).”
Inequality, Democracy, and Institutions: A Critical Review of Recent Research (2010, unknown): “For instance, redistribution can be limited when political participation of the rich is more likely than the poor, when the poor oppose it because of the prospects of upward mobility, and when the rich tends to evade taxes (see, for a review, Borck, 2007; Putterman, Roemer, & Silvestre, 1998).”
ETHNIC DIVERSITY, PUBLIC SPENDING, AND INDIVIDUAL SUPPORT FOR THE WELFARE STATE: A REVIEW OF THE EMPIRICAL LITERATURE (2013, unknown): “See for instance Piketty (1995), Ravallion and Lokshin (2000), Bénabou and Ok (2001), Corneo (2001), Corneo and Grüner (2000, 2002), Senik (2004, 2006, 2008), Alesina and La Ferrara (2005b), and the surveys by Borck (2007) and by Alesina and Giuliano (2009).”