Estimating the dimensionality of intelligence like data using Exploratory Graph Analysis

121 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Investigating the performance of Exploratory Graph analysis and traditional techniques to identify the number of latent factors: a simulation and tutorial (2018, result): “Also, while preliminary studies have compared traditional factor analytic methods with EGA (Golino & Demetriou, 2017; Golino & Epskamp, 2017), there is a need to compare the performance of EGA with different types of parallel analysis as well as techniques based on the scree test (Cattell, 1966),…”
A Psychometric Network Perspective on the Validity and Validation of Personality Trait Questionnaires (2019, methodology): “…simulation studies have shown that EGA has comparable or better accuracy for identifying the number of dimensions than the most accurate factor analytic techniques (e.g. parallel analysis; Christensen, 2020; Golino and Demetriou, 2017; Golino and Epskamp, 2017; Golino et al., 2020).”