Six Decades of Top Economics Publishing: Who and How?

By Daniel S. Hamermesh. 2013

353 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/daa811923c1223b4448390707973a3904e0886a0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Economics and Econometrics

Citations in the corpus

The Age of the Applied Economist: The Transformation of Economics Since the 1970s (2016, neutral): “Those economists who rejected contingent valuation, from Charles Plott and Vernon Smith to Daniel Hausman and Peter Diamond, and those who endorsed it, Alan Randall and Michael Hanemann, therefore exhibited diverging epistemological postures regarding what counted as good applications, as did variou”
Gender Differences in Recognition for Group Work (2020, background): “Economics is a relevant setting as there is a large tenure gap between men and women, and because the amount of coauthoring has risen dramatically in recent years (Ginther and Kahn, 2004; Hamermesh, 2013).”
Quantifying China's Regional Economic Complexity (2017, methodology): “o the data revolutionof the past decades [4], a branch of economic research has been moving to data-driven approaches within the methodology of naturalscience, statistical physicsandcomplexitysciences[5,6, 7], whichmakesit possibleto introducenew metrics that surpass the traditional economic measure”
Behavioral Economics: Past, Present and Future (2016, background): “Hamermesh ( 2013 ) finds that the percentage of “theory” papers in top economics journals has fallen from 50.7 percent in 1963 to 19.1 percent in 2011.”
Social Ties in Academia: A Friend Is a Treasure (2017, background): “For instance, ECA mainly focuses on econometric and theoretical papers, which have been less commonly cited than applied ones in recent years (Card & DellaVigna 2013; Hamermesh, 2013).”