Geometric Parameters in Nucleic Acids: Sugar and Phosphate Constituents

By A. Gelbin, B. Schneider, L. Clowney, S. Hsieh, Wilma K. Olson, Helen M. Berman. 1996

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Macromolecular structure determination using X-rays, neutrons and electrons: recent developments in Phenix (2019, methodology): “For bond lengths and angles, Phenix makes use of the CCP4 monomer library restraints (Engh & Huber, 1991; Vagin & Murshudov, 2004; Vagin et al., 2004) in protein side chains and somewhat modified classic values for nucleic acids (Clowney et al., 1996; Gelbin et al., 1996).”
A New Generation of Crystallographic Validation Tools for the Protein Data Bank (2011, unknown): “…distribution depending on the secondary structure (Berkholz et al., 2009), several bond angles at the ribose ring are bimodal between C3 0 -endo and C2 0 -endo ring puckers (Gelbin et al., 1996), and some side-chain rotamers require a widening of bond angles at C a and C b (Lovell et al., 2000).”
RNA backbone: consensus all-angle conformers and modular string nomenclature (an RNA Ontology Consortium contribution). (2008, methodology): “…phase/amplitude system) (Altona and Sundaralingam 1972; Cremer and Pople 1975) to occur within those d values, but there are so few well-authenticated examples at high resolution (Altona and Sundaralingam 1972; Olson 1982; Gelbin et al. 1996) that they could not be analyzed separately here.”
Model validation: local diagnosis, correction and when to quit (2018, background): “Bond-length and angle parameters were pioneered by Engh & Huber (1991) for proteins and by Berman and Olson (Gelbin et al., 1996) for nucleic acids; they are shown here as springs or fans, in red if too broad and in blue if too short.”