Accuracy of dietary recall using the USDA five-step multiple-pass method in men: an observational validation study.

By J. Conway, L. Ingwersen, A. Moshfegh. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 2004

547 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Misreporting of energy and micronutrient intake estimated by food records and 24 hour recalls, control and adjustment methods in practice (2009, background): “All of them were on a relatively small sample and the period of intake assessment was just 1 d (17–20) .”
The US Department of Agriculture Automated Multiple-Pass Method reduces bias in the collection of energy intakes. (2008, methodology): “Initially, a pencil-and-paper version of the method was used in observational validation studies in women (3) and men (4) and also in the Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study (5), a large validation study using biomarkers.”
Dietary Assessment Methodology (2017, methodology): “Evaluation of the USDA AMPM in two small observational studies indicated good agreement in mean intakes of macronutrients among men [77] and among obese women [78] and some overreporting of mean energy and carbohydrate intakes among normal and overweight women [78].”
Low Protein Intake is Associated with a Major Reduction in IGF-1, Cancer, and Overall Mortality in the 65 and Younger but Not Older Population (2014, unknown): “Finally, this approach has been found to accurately assess energy, protein, fat, and carbohydrate intake, regardless of body mass index (Conway et al., 2004).”