Vehicle Teleoperation Interfaces

By T. Fong, C. Thorpe. Auton. Robots, 2001

466 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Despite advances in autonomy, there will always be a need for human involvement in vehicle teleoperation. In particular, tasks such as exploration, reconnaissance and surveillance will continue to require human supervision, if not guidance and direct control. Thus, it is critical that the operator interface be as efficient and as capable as possible. In this paper, we provide an overview of vehicle teleoperation and present a summary of interfaces currently in use.

Subfields: Control and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/da1f8c956a28425090238695cf54e57fbdc52f68

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Control and Systems Engineering

1. Jean C. Scholtz
2. Michael A. Goodrich
3. Alan C. Schultz
4. Jessie Y.C. Chen
5. Michael Lewis
6. T. Fong
7. Aaron Steinfeld
8. Michael J. Barnes

In Mechanical Engineering

1. Michael Lewis

In Human-Computer Interaction

1. Jessie Y.C. Chen
2. T. Fong
3. Aaron Steinfeld
4. Michael J. Barnes

Citations in the corpus

• Common metrics for human-robot interaction (2006, background): “Interfaces that support this process have been highlighted as important in previous research [7], [10].”
• Immersive and collaborative data visualization using virtual reality platforms (2014, background): “These qualities have been shown to enhance collaborative teleoperation scenarios like remote driving [14] and surgery [15], just to cite a few.”
• Human Performance Issues and User Interface Design for Teleoperated Robots (2007, background): “vices such as personal digital assistant (PDA) systems [5] and cellular phones [6] to multiple-panel displays with control devices such as joysticks, wheels, and pedals [7] (see [8]”