How do foreign patent rights affect U.S. exports, affiliate sales, and licenses?
By Pamela J. D. Smith. 2001
354 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9fe0c9042d9fa5ac49f7978835dbb1709d46c65
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Economics and Econometrics
- Antoine Dechezleprêtre
- M. Glachant
- Yann Ménière
- David Popp
- I. Haščič
- W. Park
- N. Johnstone
- Brent B. Allred
In Management of Technology and Innovation
- Antoine Dechezleprêtre
- M. Glachant
- W. Park
- Yann Ménière
- I. Haščič
- Brent B. Allred
- T. Awokuse
- Peter Nunnenkamp
Citations in the corpus
- Patent Protection, Complementary Assets, and Firms' Incentives for Technology Licensing (2006, neutral): “Smith (2001) finds that U.S. firms are more likely to export or directly manufacture than to license technology in countries with weak patent regimes.”
- What Drives the International Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies? Empirical Evidence from Patent Data (2012, positive): “There is no doubt that the use of both channels positively depends on the strength of IP law in the recipient country, but not with the same intensity (Maskus, 2000; Smith, 2001; Evus, 2010).”
- Invention and Transfer of Climate Change Mitigation Technologies on a Global Scale: A Study Drawing on Patent Data (2010, neutral): “Data on royalty payments have been mostly used to analyze the impact of stricter patent protection on technology transfer (Smith, 2001; Yang and Maskus, 2001; Branstetter et al., 2006).”
- Invention and Transfer of Climate Change–Mitigation Technologies: A Global Analysis (2011, methodology): “Data on royalty payments have been used mostly to analyze the impact of stricter patent protection on technology transfer (Smith 2001; Yang and Maskus 2001; Branstetter, Fisman, and Foley 2006).”
- Environmental Regulation and the Cross-Border Diffusion of New Technology: Evidence from Automobile Patents (2015, neutral): “This literature has dentified three channels through which new technology flows and here patent protection is frequently used: trade in goods, foreign irect investment and licensing (Smith, 2001; Eaton and Kortum, 002; Branstetter et al., 2006).”
- The Composition of Foreign Direct Investment and Protection of Intellectual Property Rights Evidence from Transition Economies (2002, neutral): “All information on 6rm characteristics was obtained from the Worldscope database and pertains to 6scal year 1993 (from 4/93 to 3/94).”
- Information Environment and the Investment Decisions of Multinational Corporations (2013, background): “Similarly, Bushman and Smith (2001) and Armstrong et al. (2010) discuss several cases in which external information is used to facilitate internal governance mechanisms that 1 Throughout the paper, we use the terms “MNCs” and “parents” interchangeably.”
- Intellectual Property Rights, Technology Transfer and Exports in Developing Countries (2009, background): “…Classification: F14 L13 O1 O34 Keywords: Intellectual property rights Technology transfer Exports We develop a model to analyze one mechanism under which stronger intellectual property rights (IPR) protection may improve the ability of firms in developing countries to break into export markets.”
- The influence of patent protection on firm innovation investment in manufacturing industries (2007, background): “Smith (2001) found that patent rights affect the structure of exporting and technology transfer (i.e. sales and licensing of U.S. affiliates).”
- The role of patent protection in (clean/green) technology transfer (2010, neutral): “ Smith (2001) uses a sample of U.S. firms to analyze how the strength of patent regimes abroad influence the way in which these firms service foreign markets.”
- Do Stronger Intellectual Property Rights Protection Induce More Bilateral Trade? Evidence from China's Imports (2008, background): “by multinational corporations as the preferred alternative to international trade in commodities (Smith, 2001).”
- Intellectual property rights and foreign direct investment: A disaggregated analysis (2004, background): “1 It is striking that the cross-section analysis is performed for the year 1989 in the recently published paper of Smith (2001). The reasons given in the paper are not convincing.”