Explaining Complex Behavior: Two Perspectives on the Concept Of Generalized Operant Classes

By D. Barnes-Holmes, Yvonne Barnes-Holmes. 2000

102 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Developmental and Educational Psychology, General Health Professions

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9f47043e74732476f6e70e85073e1211ba171ae

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

1. D. Barnes-Holmes
2. Yvonne Barnes-Holmes
3. P. Smeets
4. V. Cullinan
5. Geraldine Leader
6. Steven C. Hayes
7. Ian Stewart
8. Sean Hughes

In General Health Professions

1. P. Smeets
2. D. Barnes-Holmes
3. Yvonne Barnes-Holmes

Citations in the corpus

• Relational Frame Theory: Some Implications for Understanding and Treating Human Psychopathology (2004, unknown): “In this case, the relational response comes under the control of the words “more” or “less”, rather than a formal stimulus dimension (Barnes & Roche, 1996; Barnes-Holmes & Barnes-Holmes, 2000).”
• Relational Frame Theory and Stimulus Equivalence: Conceptual and Procedural Issues (2004, methodology): “The critical point here, is that RFT argues that derived relating can be brought under antecedent and consequential control, and thus specific patterns of relational responding may be conceptualized as generalized operant classes (see Barnes-Holmes & Barnes-Holmes, 2000, for a detailed discussion).”