The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors

By Miriam Butt, Wilhelm Geuder. 2004

400 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9f0b9e3fceb25ebef08f5d88a2f1a810f6b3925

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Semantic Proto-Roles (2015, unknown): “…1967; Jackendoff, 1972; 1987; Cruse, 1973; Talmy, 1978; Chomsky, 1981; Carlson, 1984; Carlson and Tanenhaus, 1988; Rappaport and Levin, 1988; Rappaport Hovav and Levin, 1998; Levin and Rappaport Hovav, 2005; Dowty, 1989; 1991; Parsons, 1990; Croft, 1991; Davis and Koenig, 2000, among…”
Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax (2008, background): “…still seek to encode some notion of selectional information that constrains the way lexical items can be associated withsyntactic structure (so in this sense I will consider myself responsible for at leastsome of the data cited by the lexicalist camp e.g. Levin and Rappaport 1998, Reinhart 2002).”
Possession and the double object construction (2002, unknown): “Jelinek (1997) argues that possession in Hiaki is expressed not by incorporating the HAVE preposition into the verb, but rather by incorporating the entire possessed N head into the empty verbal position.”
Voice and Ellipsis (2013, methodology): “Here I use vtrans from Kratzer 1996 to introduce the external argument, vobj from Jelinek 1998 to introduce the direct object (what Jelinek calls v[trans]; cf. Bowers 1993, 2002, Basilico 1998, and Hallman 2004), and vP to introduce arguments that are marked with various prepositions, following the…”
Case-Marking Strategies (2008, background): “In Finnish, a strong object is obtained when the predicate is bounded (that is, non-homogeneous) (Kiparsky 1998).”
Time and the event: The semantics of Russian prefixes (2005, background): “…particular decomposition utilises three heads instead of the two more commonly found in decompositions of this type (cf. Ritter and Rosen (1998), Borer (2003) Hale and Keyser (1993)) or even of the semantic decompositions postulated at the lexical level (Dowty (1979), Levin and Rappaport (1998)).”
Reflections on Manner/Result Complementarity* (2010, background): “…much current work, (e.g., Borer 2005, Goldberg 1995, Hale and Keyser 2002, Jackendoff 1990, Marantz 1997, Pesetsky 1995, Pinker 1989, Rappaport Hovav and Levin 1998), we adopt the distinction between an idiosyncratic component of verb meaning, often called the " root " , and a structural…”
The syntax–discourse interface in near-native L2 acquisition: Off-line and on-line performance* (2009, background): “In other words, scrambling serves the discourse function of moving (given) constituents out of sentential focus to allow other constituents to bear focus (Neeleman and Reinhart, 1998).”
Special Issue Introduction: Semantic Role Labeling: An Introduction to the Special Issue (2008, unknown): “Other work also eschews the notion of a simple list of roles, instead postulating underlying semantic structure that captures the relevant properties (Levin and Rappaport Hovav 1998).”