Anticipating upcoming words in discourse: evidence from ERPs and reading times.

By J. V. van Berkum, Colin M. Brown, Pienie Zwitserlood, V. Kooijman, Peter Hagoort. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2005

931 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d9c09f071b3d6aae0abcc40c08ae97cde0f92e80

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Cognitive Neuroscience

In Developmental and Educational Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

On the use of verb-based implicit causality in sentence comprehension : Evidence from self-paced reading and eye tracking (2006, methodology): “Forty stories of an unrelated experiment were included as fillers (see Van Berkum et al., 2005b, Experiment 3).”
The effect of word predictability on reading time is logarithmic (2013, background): “…there is ample independent evidence that the comprehension system anticipates upcoming material in at least some situations (Altmann & Kamide, 1999; DeLong et al., 2005; Kamide et al., 2003; Kamide, Scheepers, & Altmann, 2003; Knoeferle et al., 2005; Van Berkum et al., 2005; Wicha et al., 2003).”
The neurobiology of language beyond single words. (2014, background): “Brain 134:415–31 Van Berkum JJ, Brown CM, Zwitserlood P, Kooijman V, Hagoort P. 2005.”
Incrementality and Prediction in Human Sentence Processing (2009, background): “Thus, the less likely “airplane” was as a continuation, the less likely would be the article “an,” and the greater would be the N400 to this article (see also Van Berkum et al., 2005, for an auditory equivalent that led to the same conclusions).”
Interplay between acoustic/phonetic and semantic processes during spoken sentence comprehension: an ERP study. (2011, neutral): “…of research indeed suggests that the brain can exploit various constraining information (e.g. morpho-syntactic, lexico-semantic) during sentence and discourse comprehension to make predictions about upcoming events (Federmeier, 2007; Kotz et al., 2009; Lau et al., 2006; Van Berkum et al., 2005).”
Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. (2012, methodology): “In the Spanish and Dutch studies, the responses to the inappropriate articles or adjectives were not enhanced N400s but larger positive potentials relative to the appropriate control words (van Berkum et al., 2005; Wicha et al., 2004).”
Understanding Sentences in Context What Brain Waves Can Tell Us (2008, neutral): “As can be seen in Figure 2a, the prediction of an upcoming Dutch noun can be detected by preceding it with an incorrectly gender-marked adjective ( Van Berkum, Brown, Zwitserlood, Kooijman, & Hagoort, 2005; see also Otten & Van Berkum, in press).”
Individual differences in working memory and processing speed predict anticipatory spoken language processing in the visual world (2016, neutral): “…pre-activate the semantic/conceptual features (Federmeier & Kutas, 1999; Federmeier, McLennan, Ochoa, & Kutas, 2002), morphosyntactic features (Van Berkum et al., 2005; Wicha, Moreno, & Kutas, 2003, 2004), the phonological form (DeLong et al., 2005), and the orthographic form (Laszlo &…”
When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse (2005, background): “1102 Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience Volume 18, Number 7 1999; Sedivy, Tanenhaus, Chambers, & Carlson, 1999), as well as with other ERP effects of discourse-based predictive processes (e.g., Van Berkum, Brown, et al., 2005; Wicha, Bates, Moreno, & Kutas, 2003).”
On the Meaning of Words and Dinosaur Bones: Lexical Knowledge Without a Lexicon (2009, background): “This point has been made by many, including Kintsch (1988), Langacker (1987), McClelland et al. (1989), and van Berkum et al. (2003, 2005).”