Discrete thoughts: Why cognition must use discrete representations
By Eric Dietrich, Arthur B. Markman. 2003
93 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Social Psychology
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d982ee272e120e452ef9bfcf61269d6722021c8c
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Cognitive Neuroscience
- N. Ambady
- Jonathan B. Freeman
- Sabrina Golonka
- Robert F. Port
- Andrew D. Wilson
- Mariëlle Leijten
- Luuk Van Waes
In Developmental and Educational Psychology
In Social Psychology
- N. Ambady
- Sabrina Golonka
- Robert F. Port
- Andrew D. Wilson
- Hillary Anger Elfenbein
- Gerben A. van Kleef
- Lisa Feldman Barrett
- Dawn A. Matsumoto
Citations in the corpus
- Embodied Cognition is Not What you Think it is (2013, methodology): “Cognitive science is, therefore, in the business of identifying this content and how it is accessed and used (see Dietrich and Markman, 2003 for a discussion of this).”
- MouseTracker: Software for studying real-time mental processing using a computer mouse-tracking method (2010, background): “Part of the story may be researchers’ genuine subscription to discrete representational or symbolicist accounts of cognition (see, e.g., Dietrich & Markman, 2003; Newell, 1980; Pylyshyn, 1984), but some of this may be due to the simple fact that the methodological toolbox has not yet seen somethin”
- How are words stored in memory? Beyond phones and phonemes (2007, background): “One important one is a fundamental property of language that has been noted by many observers over the years (e.g., Abler, 1989; Chomsky & Halle, 1964; Dietrich & Markman, 2003; Goldstein & Fowler, 2003; Hockett, 1968; Holland, 1995; Studdert-Kennedy, 2003; Von Humboldt, 1836/1972).”