Recall-to-Reject in Recognition: Evidence from ROC Curves ☆ ☆☆

By C. Rotello, N. Macmillan, Gordon Van Tassel. 2000

222 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Reducing false recognition with criterial recollection tests: Distinctiveness heuristic versus criterion shifts (2004, background): “Even in dual process theories that allow for recollection and familiarity (e.g., Rotello, Macmillan, & Van Tassel, 2000; Yonelinas, 1997), the picture/word effect on false recognition could be caused by a familiarity-based criterion shift alone.”
The medial temporal lobe and recognition memory. (2007, background): “142 CONCLUSIONS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 142 Medial temporal lobe (MTL): the combination of the parahippocampal region and hippocampus”
The Nature of Recollection and Familiarity: A Review of 30 Years of Research (2002, background): “In tests o word–word, word–modality, and word–list a sociative recognition, the observed ROCs relatively linear compared to item recognitio (e.g., Rotello et al., 2000; Yonelinas, 199 1999).”
Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary-learning-systems approach. (2003, result): “This prediction is consistent with the view, expressed in several empirical studies, that recall is especially important for discriminating between studied items and very similar distractors (see, e.g., Hintzman, Curran, & Oppy, 1992; Rotello et al., 2000).”