Quantifying Biases in Causal Models: Classical Confounding vs Collider-Stratification Bias
By Sander Greenland. 2003
838 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Statistics and Probability
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Statistics and Probability
- Sander Greenland
- Stephen R. Cole
- Thomas S. Richardson
- G. Danaei
- D. Westreich
- Mohammad Ali Mansournia
- J. Rohrer
- Miguel A. Hern'an
Citations in the corpus
- Handling time varying confounding in observational research (2017, background): “Secondly, selection (also known as collider stratification) bias, 11 which occurs by inappropriately adjusting for a time varying confounder that may share a common cause with the outcome.”
- Single World Intervention Graphs ( SWIGs ) : A Unification of the Counterfactual and Graphical Approaches to Causality (2013, methodology): “1 in Pearl (2009), shown in Figure 16, is a familiar example of ‘m-bias’ (Greenland, 2003) where Y (a) ?? A, yet Y (a) 6 ??A | Z.”
- How to control confounding effects by statistical analysis (2012, background): “A successful randomization minimizes confounding by unmeasured as well as measured factors, whereas statistical control that addresses confounding by measurement and can introduce confounding through inappropriate control (7-9).”
- The table 2 fallacy: presenting and interpreting confounder and modifier coefficients. (2013, background): “We note that in Figure 2, the confounding of age modification of the HIV effect measure by U would be entirely due to conditioning on smoking (which is a collider for U and age (17)); again, however, conditioning on smoking was necessary to remove confounding by smoking and by U of the HIV effect me”
- Machine learning and deep learning—A review for ecologists (2022, neutral): “An example is severe feature col-linearity, where including all features increases the uncertainties of the estimates (Greenland, 2003; Lederer et al., 2018 ), whereas removing features, even if causally connected to the response, can improve predictive performance (Arif & MacNeil, 2022 ; Dormann…”
- Constructing inverse probability weights for marginal structural models. (2008, background): “First, the addition of a nonconfounding variable may introduce selection bias due to collider stratification (29, 30).”