Single World Intervention Graphs ( SWIGs ) : A Unification of the Counterfactual and Graphical Approaches to Causality
By Thomas S. Richardson. 2013
448 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Graph Learning, Causal Inference & Discovery
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Graph Learning
- Christina Heinze-Deml
- Sander Greenland
- Jan Peters
- Peter Buhlmann
- Adam Baker
- Stefan Bauer
- Joris M. Mooij
- Suchi Saria
In Causal Inference & Discovery
- Bernhard Schölkopf
- Judea Pearl
- Jan Peters
- Nicolai Meinshausen
- Peter Buhlmann
- Nathan Kallus
- Tyler J. VanderWeele
- Christina Heinze-Deml
Citations in the corpus
- Learning Optimal Fair Policies (2018, methodology): “1(c), due to the presence of the path Y ← M → A (Richardson and Robins 2013).”
- Causal Reasoning for Algorithmic Fairness (2018, background): “Models that follow this approach and specify solely the univariate marginals of a counterfactual joint distribution are sometimes called single-world models [32].”
- Fair Inference on Outcomes (2017, background): “Such models generalize independence models on directed acyclic graphs, also known as Bayesian networks (Pearl 1988), to also encode conditional independence statements on counterfactual random variables (Richardson and Robins 2013).”
- Causal Models for Dynamical Systems (2020, background): “Many researchers from various disciplines engaged in this question and developed the fundamental assumptions that are often referred to as invariance, autonomy, or modularity [Wright 1921, Haavelmo 1944, Aldrich 1989, Hoover 1990, Pearl 2009, Richardson and Robins 2013, Imbens and Rubin 2015].”
- Counterfactual Normalization: Proactively Addressing Dataset Shift and Improving Reliability Using Causal Mechanisms (2018, methodology): “Graphical Representations of Counterfactuals: The node-splitting operation we introduce in Section 3 is similar to the node-splitting operation in Single World Intervention Graphs (SWIGs) (Richardson and Robins, 2013).”
- Causal Structure Learning (2017, methodology): “Without assuming anything on the joint noise distributions under different interventions, a causal model can equivalently be formulated via structural equations, a graphical model, or potential outcomes (Richardson and Robins, 2013; Imbens, 2014).”
- Long-term Causal Inference Under Persistent Confounding via Data Combination (2022, background): “See Figure 2a for a single world intervention graph illustration [Richardson and Robins, 2013] when intervening on the variable A.”
- Quantum common causes and quantum causal models (2016, background): “a record of this value, and preparing Xi to have this value, corresponding to Pðki; Xi jXi Þ 1⁄4 δki;XIi δXOi ;Xi (passive observation of Xi); observing Xi , keeping a record of its value, and repreparing Xi to have a fixed value x, corresponding to Pðki; Xi jXiÞ 1⁄4 δki;XIi δXOi ;x (the sort of int”
- Guarding Against Adversarial Domain Shifts with Counterfactual Regularization (2017, unknown): “For a formal justification of using a causal graph and potential outcome notation simultaneously see Richardson and Robins (2013).”
- Causal Dantzig: Fast inference in linear structural equation models with hidden variables under additive interventions (2017, background): “Note that we did not make any cross-world assumptions (Richardson and Robins (2013)), that is, we made no assumptions on the joint distribution of Y(x), x ∈ range(X) or on the joint distribution of X(e), e ∈ E .”
- On Partial Identification of the Pure Direct Effect (2015, background): “This issue has been discussed extensively (Robins and Richardson, 2010; Richardson and Robins, 2013), and in large part motivated the development of the single-world intervention graphs (SWIGs) of Richardson and Robins (2013).”
- Causal mediation analysis for stochastic interventions (2019, unknown): “Related approaches have been proposed by Robins (1986), Spirtes et al. (2000), Dawid (2000) and Richardson and Robins (2013).”
- Text and Causal Inference: A Review of Using Text to Remove Confounding from Causal Estimates (2020, background): “structural causal models (SCM) (Pearl, 2009b) and potential outcomes (Rubin, 1974, 2005), which are complementary and theoretically connected (Pearl, 2009b; Richardson and Robins, 2013; Morgan and Winship, 2015).”
- Causal diagrams for interference (2014, background): “Recently, Richardson and Robins (2013) introduced a new class of causal diagrams called single world intervention graphs (SWIGs).”