Why flute : Folsom point design and adaptation

By S. A. Ahler, Phil R. Geib. 2000

111 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Anthropology, Archeology, Paleontology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8b55c24659242e971e93996e0b64f6ba48259b7

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Anthropology

1. Briggs Buchanan
2. M. J. O’Brien

In Archeology

1. Briggs Buchanan
2. Mark Collard

In Paleontology

1. R. Lyman
2. Briggs Buchanan
3. M. J. O’Brien
4. Mark Collard
5. Matthew T. Boulanger
6. John Darwent

Citations in the corpus

• Innovation and cultural transmission in the American Paleolithic: Phylogenetic analysis of eastern Paleoindian projectile-point classes (2014, background): “In the West, especially the Plains and Southwest, Clovis points were followed by ‘‘Folsom’’ points, which tend to be smaller in size than Clovis points and to have more-invasive channel flakes (Ahler and Geib, 2000; Buchanan and Collard, 2010; Collard et al., 2010; Crabtree, 1966; Wormington, 1957) ”
• An analysis of Folsom projectile point resharpening using quantitative comparisons of form and allometry (2006, methodology): “Considerable efforts also have been expended toward determining how and why Folsom points were manufactured and fluted [2,3,20,26,29,31, 33,34,36,56,83,87,91].”