An analysis of Folsom projectile point resharpening using quantitative comparisons of form and allometry

By Briggs Buchanan. 2006

104 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/10cdae2a53aae409b3518fbd2fa7254ff36234f8

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Sociology and Political Science

1. R. Lyman
2. M. J. O’Brien
3. Matthew T. Boulanger
4. John Darwent
5. Mark Collard
6. K. Weedman
7. Michael J. Shott
8. Briggs Buchanan

Citations in the corpus

• Measuring reduction in stone tools: an ethnoarchaeological study of Gamo hidescrapers from Ethiopia (2007, background): “It is amply documented in many tool types from many times and places around the world (e.g., Andrefsky, 1997, 2006; Ballenger, 2001; Blades, 2003; Buchanan, 2006; Clarkson and Lamb, 2005; Dibble, 1995; Dibble, 1997; Flenniken and Wilke, 1989; Granger, 1978; Grimes and Grimes, 1985; Hiscock, 1996; Hi”
• Innovation and cultural transmission in the American Paleolithic: Phylogenetic analysis of eastern Paleoindian projectile-point classes (2014, methodology): “Our impression is that Folsom points are more standardized in terms of shape than Clovis points, perhaps reflecting strict requirements imposed by the hafting technique (Amick, 1995; Buchanan, 2006; Judge, 1970; Tunnell and Johnson, 1991).”