The “state of the art” of the diffraction analysis of crystallite size and lattice strain

By E. J. Mittemeijer, U. Welzel. 2008

325 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ceramics and Composites, Geophysics, Materials Chemistry

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8acdd2069969fce0bc402e621bd14b31405c951

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ceramics and Composites

1. Yu-Ching Weng
2. I. Popov
3. V. Uvarov
4. W. Yao
5. Jeffery Catchmark

In Geophysics

1. Yu-Ching Weng
2. I. Popov
3. V. Uvarov
4. W. Yao
5. Jeffery Catchmark

In Materials Chemistry

1. V. Uvarov
2. I. Popov
3. Yu-Ching Weng
4. W. Yao
5. Jeffery Catchmark

Citations in the corpus

• Metrological characterization of X-ray diffraction methods at different acquisition geometries for determination of crystallite size in nano-scale materials (2013, methodology): “[38] Mittemeijer EJ, Welzel U.”
• Improved cellulose X-ray diffraction analysis using Fourier series modeling (2020, methodology): “Three analytical concepts are adopted to calculate cellulose CI with XRD data (Mittemeijer and Welzel 2008): peak intensity analysis such as peak height method, line profile decomposition such as peak decomposition or deconvolution (Lanson 1997; Park et al. 2010; Ahvenainen et al. 2016), and line…”