Return of Inequality in Modern Society? Test by Dispersion of Life-Satisfaction Across Time and Nations
By R. Veenhoven. 2005
148 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: General Health Professions, Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d89667fda9d8ff6324ace32aa89bf602714b1557
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In General Health Professions
In Social Psychology
- E. Scott Huebner
- Nansook Park
- Lili Tian
- R. Gilman
- M. Hagerty
- P. Alex Linley
- R. Veenhoven
- John Maltby
In Sociology and Political Science
- M. Hagerty
- R. Veenhoven
- Lili Tian
- Nansook Park
- R. Gilman
- E. Scott Huebner
- Robert M. Klassen
- J. Nawijn
Citations in the corpus
- Inequality Of Happiness in Nations (2005, background): “Kalmijn and Veenhoven (2005) take stock of various statistics of dispersion and inspect which of these are most appropriate for quantifying difference of happiness in nations.”
- Cross-National Adolescent Multidimensional Life Satisfaction Reports: Analyses of Mean Scores and Response Style Differences (2008, background): “For example, subjective appraisals of life quality are related to objective living conditions (Veenhoven, 2005), and higher appraisals are often found among nations reporting more favorable living conditions (Biswas-Diener and Diener, 2001).”
- Rising Happiness in Nations 1946–2004: A Reply to Easterlin (2006, methodology): “1 This estimate is based on average scores reported in the World Database of Happiness, section 'Distributional Findings in Nations (Veenhoven 2005) 2 When happiness has been assessed in more than one survey in the same year, we take the average.”