Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research?
By Richard L. Priem, J. E. Butler. 2001
2,435 citations recorded by the source corpus.
Subfields: Strategy and Management
View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8787f2e801b0cdc594a41245788049341f89415
How researchers see this paper
The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.
In Strategy and Management
- K. Meyer
- Mike W. Peng
- N. J. Foss
- Garry D. Bruton
- David J. Teece
- Neil A. Morgan
- Kevin Zheng Zhou
- Christos N. Pitelis
Citations in the corpus
- Critical success factors from IT outsourcing theories: an empirical study (2005, background): “When the latter occurs, a competitive advantage has been created ( Priem and Butler, 2001”
- Patents as Surrogates for Inimitable and Non-Substitutable Resources (2004, background): “These findings are important because, despite RBV’s face validity and rapid diffusion throughout the management literature, there have only been limited explicit testing of its tenets (cf.,Miller & Shamsie, 1996; Priem & Butler, 2001).”
- Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance (2009, background): “The dynamic capabilities approach in strategy research (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000; Teece et al., 1997) suggests that core resources or capabilities that bring a firm competitive advantage are often specialized to the firm’s particular operating context (Brush and Artz, 1999; Priem and Butler, 200”
- Is firm-specific innovation associated with greater value appropriation? The roles of environmental dynamism and technological diversity (2010, background): “Total value creation often varies according to the environmental context—the market condition or competitive situation (e.g., Barney, 2001; Bowman and Amrosini, 2000; Brush and Artz, 1999; Miller and Shamise, 1996; Priem and Butler, 2001).”
- Covid‐19 pandemic and consumer‐employee‐organization wellbeing: A dynamic capability theory approach (2021, background): “However, various authors have criticized that resource-based theory fails to explain the usage of a resource to attain competitive advantage (Priem & Butler, 2001) as it fails to consider external environment that keeps changing.”
- Scientific Progress in Strategic Management: The Case of the Resource-Based View (2007, positive): “1 In particular, the Barney (1991) paper with its handy and easy-to-comprehend VRI (with the “O” added later) formulation of the conditions of sustained competitive advantage appears to have been particularly important for spreading the RBV gospel (Priem and Butler 2001).”
- Human capital convergences in intellectual capital and sustainability reports (2007, background): “…that could provide a competitive edge over the long term (Argyris, 1992; Argyris and Schön, 1996; Barney, 1991, 2001; Bontis et al., 2002; Grant, 1991, 1996a, b; Itami and Roehl, 1987; Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995; Priem and Butler, 2001a, b; Peteraf, 1993; Senge, 1990; Wernerfelt, 1984, 1995).”