We're in it together: interpersonal management of disclosure in social network services

By Airi Lampinen, Vilma Lehtinen, Asko Lehmuskallio, Sakari Tamminen. International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2011

311 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Information Systems and Management, Sociology and Political Science

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d86c4dc108cf7262f56ce05a1dbfbada7e2299bf

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Information Systems and Management

In Sociology and Political Science

Citations in the corpus

Silent Listeners: The Evolution of Privacy and Disclosure on Facebook (2013, background): “For a number of reasons, not every user ID corresponded to an active profile,7 which reduced our valid t0 observation set to 6,142 observations, producing an effective panel mortality rate of 1066 members.”
Privacy as part of the app decision-making process (2013, background): “They found that most users do not pay attention to the permissions screens at install time (83%) and that only three percent of their surveyed users had a good understanding of what the permissions were actually asking for access to [9].”
Sociality Through Social Network Sites (2013, background): “” For example, scholars who were analyzing privacy settings and privacy practices on Facebook in 2005 (Gross and Acquisti 2005) document very different practices than those who study privacy later (e.g. boyd and Marwick 2011; Lampinen et al. 2011; Stutzman and Kramer-Duffield 2010).”
The Debate on the Moral Responsibilities of Online Service Providers (2015, background): “…for collectively managing the shared information, e.g. establishing a friendship-based model for privacy protection (Besmer et al. 2009), or rules of thumb regarding sharing with other users, such as asking for approval before disclosing content from those involved (Lampinen et al. 2011).”
Five Years of the Right to be Forgotten (2019, background): “These arise due to diverging views of how content should be shared and how broadly [6, 16, 17, 20, 27].”