Neuropolitics: Thinking, Culture, Speed

By W. Connolly. 2002

401 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d8210054407b98eaae585f2d7aba81cef7af0ae0

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Materials and devices of the public: an introduction (2011, background): “…that a similar ‘material turn’ would be deployed in the attempt to recast the concepts and modes of argumentation characteristic of political philosophy, a field that, despite some forceful challenges (e.g. Connolly, 2002; Mouffe, 2000), remains wedded to prescriptive styles of theorization.”
Reinventing psychological matters: the importance of the suggestive realm of Tarde's ontology (2007, background): “This points towards the importance of a ‘neuropolitics of the subliminal’ (Connolly 2002 in Thrift 2004: 68), which foregrounds psychological matters as an important dimension of social theory.”
The Human Sciences in a Biological Age (2013, background): “It is becoming commonplace for those from the social and human sciences to allude to biological arguments to support their claim that human beings are not individuated, conscious and rational, but rather are enmeshed in sensations and contagions, shaped by affective and non-cognitive force fields (C”
Recorded music and practices of remembering (2004, background): “…in the context of the domestic geographies of care Sarah is entangled within, to act as a practice of recollection that is, in addition, one of a number of now-mundane techniques whereby practices of thinking are ‘altered in … direction, speed, intensity, or sensibility’ (Connolly 2002: 100).”
Regulating economic globalization (2004, background): “…exceed the traditional sites of community, town hall, parliament, state and nation, spilling over into the machinery of virtual public spheres, international organizations, global social movements, diaspora politics, and planetary or cosmopolitan projects (Hardt and Negri, 2000; Connolly, 2002).”
Biology’s Gift: Interrogating the Turn to Affect (2010, background): “William Connolly notes, for example, that his aim in his book Neuropolitics is not ‘to derive the logic of cultural activity from neuroscience.”
Affect, Relationality and the `Problem of Personality' (2008, background): “This attention to realms of non-conscious perception is increasingly being recognized in the present as an important yet neglected aspect of theorizations of affect and intensity (Connolly, 2002; Orr, 2006; Thrift, 2004).”
Emotional Reconciliation (2008, background): “The latter two authors have, in addition, outlined the relevance of recent insights on affect from the neurosciences and attempted to apply them to the study of political phenomena (see also Connolly, 2002).”