Measuring the Mind: Relations between the models

By Denny Borsboom. 2005

483 citations recorded by the source corpus.

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d81b822738c12eca0e7815be199651b12004502a

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Citations in the corpus

Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques (2011, background): “This is consistent with the views of several other researchers (e.g., Blalock 1964; Borsboom 2005; Edwards and Bagozzi 2000; Goertz 2006; Law and Wong 1999; MacCallum and Browne 1993; MacKenzie et al. 2005), who argue that for some latent constructs it makes more sense to view meaning as emanating…”
A comprehensive review of Rasch measurement in language assessment: Recommendations and guidelines for research (2020, background): “Second, in Rasch measurement, items are regressed on the latent variable; therefore, it is essential that unexplained variances in the items do not correlate with each other (Borsboom, 2005).”
The Fallacy of Formative Measurement (2011, background): “These criticisms integrate and extend concerns about formative measurement that have begun to emerge (Bagozzi, 2007; Borsboom, 2005; Borsboom, Mellenbergh, & Van Heerden, 2003, 2004; Howell, Breivik, & Wilcox, 2007a, 2007b; Iacobucci, 2010; Wilcox, Howell, & Breivik, 2008).”
The ‘Short Five’ (S5): Measuring Personality Traits Using Comprehensive Single Items (2012, background): “(quoted by Borsboom, 2005, p. 17).”
Targeting the Benchmark: On Methodology in Current Natural Language Processing Research (2020, methodology): “, it is tempting to see a similarity to tasks used in intelligence testing (see e.g. Borsboom (2005) for an introduction).”
State of the aRt personality research: A tutorial on network analysis of personality data in R (2015, unknown): “The primary reason for this is that current personality questionnaires are built according to psychometric methodology that is tightly coupled to factor analysis and classical test theory (Borsboom, 2005).”
Reconceptualizing entrepreneurial orientation (2015, background): “Furthermore, because the indicators are all observable manifestations of the same underlying latent phenomenon, we a priori expect the indicators to covary and to share the same antecedents (Borsboom, 2005).”
Comorbidity: A network perspective (2010, background): “The reason is that the presence of direct causal relations between symptoms contradicts the essential assumptions that underlie psychology’s main class of measurement models (latent variable models; e.g., Borsboom 2005; 2008; Borsboom et al. 2003).”
Assessment and learning: fields apart? (2017, methodology): “Psychometrics is still generally grounded in modernist practices (Borsboom, 2005; Michell, 1997a; Mislevy, 1997).”
On the Use, the Misuse, and the Very Limited Usefulness of Cronbach’s Alpha (2008, background): “Molenaar (2004; also, see Borsboom, 2005, pp. 68–81) noted that in general a singleadministration sample of test scores does not contain information about the individuals’ propensity distributions unless both types of distributions—between individuals as in singleadministration data and within…”
Dimensions of Normal Personality as Networks in Search of Equilibrium: You Can't like Parties if you Don't like People (2012, background): “26: 414–431 (2012) DOI: 10.1002/per value of any one of the conscientiousness items (Jöreskog, 1971; Lord & Novick, 1968; see also Borsboom, 2005).”
The MIMIC model and formative variables: problems and solutions (2013, background): “This explains why Borsboom et al. (2003) consider that a MIMIC model is not a formative latent variable model but is rather a reflective latent variable model (with all the associated entity realism foundations) predicted by a set of causes.”
A Review of Key Likert Scale Development Advances: 1995–2019 (2021, background): “Although no common construct exists among these items, the scale can certainly be scored and will probably even be reliable, as the random error variance will be low (Borsboom, 2005).”
Item response theory and clinical measurement. (2009, background): “F or p er so na l u se o nl y. helps elucidate how and why changes on a latent variable cause changes in item responding (for a similar view, see Borsboom 2005).”
Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems. (2008, background): “matters (Borsboom, 2005), but researchers seem to get along quite well with it in the sense that they have”