Psychometric perspectives on diagnostic systems.

By Denny Borsboom. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 2008

613 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/16e68d8ddf3fae26d283d8bb0ab33bb0d7a37aff

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Clinical Psychology

In Experimental and Cognitive Psychology

Citations in the corpus

Qgraph: Network visualizations of relationships in psychometric data (2012, neutral): “qgraph was developed in the context of network approaches to psychometrics (Cramer et al. 2010; Borsboom 2008; Schmittmann et al. 2012), in which theoretical constructs in psychology are hypothesized to be networks of causally coupled variables.”
Generalized Network Psychometrics: Combining Network and Latent Variable Models (2016, neutral): “causal effects, semantic overlap, or reciprocal interactions between putative indicators of a latent variable (Borsboom, 2008; Cramer et al., 2010; Borsboom et al., 2011; Cramer et al., 2012; Schmittmann et al., 2013).”
Mental disorders as networks of problems: a review of recent insights (2016, neutral): “Although this scientific discipline is young, with its conceptual roots in 2008 [1] and its empirical foundations in 2010 [2], it is fast-moving and has gained considerable recognition.”
Dimensions of Normal Personality as Networks in Search of Equilibrium: You Can't like Parties if you Don't like People (2012, methodology): “…but we do object to a latent variable ‘theory’ in which the measurement model with a common cause structure is interpreted as evidence for latent causal entities that operate in the minds of individuals, causing all sorts of cognitive, affective and behavioural patterns (see also Borsboom, 2008b).”
Can network analysis transform psychopathology? (2016, background): “It seems obvious that causal interactions among symptoms abounde an assumption prohibited by the axiom of local independence that justifies inference to a latent variable as their common cause of symptom covariance (Borsboom, 2008).”
What do centrality measures measure in psychological networks? (2019, background): “Recently a new kind of network has been introduced: the psychological network (Borsboom, 2008; Borsboom & Cramer, 2013; Cramer, Waldorp, van der Maas, & Borsboom, 2010).”
Extending psychometric network analysis: Empirical evidence against g in favor of mutualism? (2019, background): “…(van der Maas et al., 2017), mutualism – the idea of dynamic coupling between cognitive abilities – aligns neatly with some of the latest and most rapid developments in psychometrics, namely psychometric network modeling (Borsboom, 2008; Epskamp, Cramer, Waldorp, Schmittmann, & Borsboom, 2012).”
Network analysis: an integrative approach to the structure of psychopathology. (2013, background): “Thus, rather than interpreting symptoms as measurements of a latent disorder (as is depicted in Figure 1; see Table 1 for the accompanying legend), symptoms are viewed as part of a causal system (Borsboom 2008a).”
Looking up at the curious personality: individual differences in curiosity and openness to experience (2020, background): “From this view, the relationship between items and Openness to Experience is mereological: items do not measure Openness to Experience but are part of it [22].”
Social Anxiety Disorder as a Densely Interconnected Network of Fear and Avoidance for Social Situations (2017, background): “The network approach to psychopathology (Borsboom 2008, 2017; Borsboom and Cramer 2013) offers a radically new way of understanding SAD.”