Location Matters: Where We Have Been and Where We Might Go in Agglomeration Research

372 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

Multilevel Approaches and the Firm‐Agglomeration Ambiguity in Economic Growth Studies (2012, neutral): “…management dynamics are promising for explaining growing firms and organizations in cities because they address the heterogeneity in the actors involved, spatial scale, selection and survival, and time and path dependency (Frenken et al. 2007, McCann and Van Oort 2009, McCann and Folta 2008).”
Who Benefits from Agglomeration? (2015, background): “MCCANN and FOLTA (2008) pushed this argument further, questioning whether all firms benefitted equally from spatial clustering.”
Technology Parks versus Science Parks: does the university make the difference? (2013, background): “Park location allows access to specialized inputs including labour, the benefits derived from knowledge spillovers (Prevezer, 1997), and reduced consumers’ search costs (McCann and Folta, 2008).”
Pricing response to entry and agglomeration effects (2010, background): “McCann and Folta, 2008 ), we focus on specific findings related to demand-side externalities.”
Country-of-origin and industry FDI agglomeration of foreign investors in an emerging economy (2011, background): “Thus, location decisions are part of a broader set of decisions on how to enter a country, which includes the choice of entry mode (McCann & Folta, 2008).”