Steering the impacts of ungulates on temperate forests

By F. Reimoser. 2003

99 citations recorded by the source corpus.

Subfields: Ecology, Global and Planetary Change, Nature and Landscape Conservation

View Paper: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/d7eec563644fa6063524021e7bc9548ad604d69d

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

In Ecology

1. M. Hayward
2. F. Klein
3. P. Green
4. Hervé Fritz
5. P. Haswell
6. J. Kusak
7. G. Kerley
8. J. O’Brien

In Global and Planetary Change

1. S. Saïd
2. P. Green
3. Hervé Fritz

In Nature and Landscape Conservation

1. M. Hayward
2. S. Saïd
3. P. Green
4. Hervé Fritz
5. P. Haswell
6. J. Kusak

Citations in the corpus

• Large carnivore impacts are context-dependent (2017, background): “The positive (Kilgo et al. 1998; Kloppers et al. 2005; Leighton et al. 2010) or negative (Hebblewhite et al. 2005; Jayakody et al. 2008; Pelletier 2006) nature of this disturbance however depends entirely on management perspective (Reimoser 2003).”
• Identifying threshold densities for wild deer in the UK above which negative impacts may occur (2011, background): “In relation to this, Reimoser (2003) has shown that the most susceptible systems are clear-cuts with afforestation, particularly small ones ( 2ha) and, with respect to browsing, timber harvest by single-tree selection when only little light reaches the forest floor.”
• Seasonal variation in diet composition and similarity of sympatric red deer Cervus elaphus and roe deer Capreolus capreolus (2008, background): “Other factors, such as the type of silvicultural system (Reimoser & Gossow 1996, Partl et al. 2002, Reimoser 2003) or the presenceofotherherbivores suchasmountainhares Lepus timidus (Hulbert &Andersen 2001),may also influence the impact of deer browsing on forest regeneration.”