Identifying threshold densities for wild deer in the UK above which negative impacts may occur

By R. Putman, J. Langbein, P. Green, P. Watson. 2011

109 citations recorded by the source corpus.

How researchers see this paper

The researchers whose trusted networks rank it highest, strongest advocate first. Every researcher gets a different order.

The challenges and opportunities of coexisting with wild ungulates in the human-dominated landscapes of Europe's Anthropocene (2019, unknown): “This provides a consequent interface between traffic and un-gulates (Bruinderink and Hazebroek, 1996; Putman et al., 2011b).”
Manipulating ungulate herbivory in temperate and boreal forests: effects on vegetation and invertebrates. A systematic review (2018, background): “Another common belief is that impacts of ungulates depend on their abundance, and some recent syntheses focused on finding threshold densities of animals for predicting or preventing ‘damage’ to the forest [13, 62].”
To feed or not to feed? Evidence of the intended and unintended effects of feeding wild ungulates (2014, background): “Many populations have grown over recent decades, causing environmental and socio-economic impacts on wider communities and conservation concerns, as well as density-dependent changes in performance (Côté et al. 2004, Putman et al. 2011).”